From the bottom of my heart, a free drawing for you
Thank you so much to everyone who’s following me! Jesus, I never thought I’d get past 100 followers :|
In order to celebrate I’m giving ONE COMMISSION FOR FREE to one of my followers, because why not.
Q:your art is sooo amazing *___*!! <3
Q:HOW DO YOU ART? WHAT IS DRAW? You're such an amazing artist and your recent Bolin portrait almost killed me (in a good way haha).
ooowww yiiisss thank you!! kajhsjkhdkj
Illustrated porn for Lieumon week: SILENCE
“Oh…what…what is that-“ Amon asked through a loud moan. The substance began to tingle as it warmed, causing him to buck up against the counter.
“Quiet,” the older man whispered into his ear. “You don’t want to get caught, do you?”
Whole story and picture under the cut (NSFW).
A/N: Collaboration between lilliphus (story) and me (art). This is the third and last prompt filled. The Spy prompt can be found here and the Cooking one here. Beware of extremely hot and kinky Lieumon porn after the cut.
No I mean because you said that they link. So if they don’t have a tumblr, but they have, say, a deviantart, you would link to the original deviation.
… Maybe I’m not explaining myself, that happens. If the artist has a DA, then you link to their page and that’s it, there’s no problem there. I was talking about how some people link to the original tumblr post in the source section but they’re uploading the image as a post of their own, therefore not reblogging and keeping the original artist from getting the notes or the feedback. Those people are downloading said pictures to their computers and posting them again, knowing perfectly well where they come from (and linking to a source so they can’t be accused of art theft) but yet refusing to reblog maybe in hopes of getting notes of their own. That’s what I call being an asshole.
My raaage. It’s why I recommend watermarks.
Exactly! Some artists don’t even like to put on a signature because they think it disrupts the image or something, and most only scribble some letters. The truth is, a legible watermark/signature at least guarantees people will know who the original artist is.
THIS. EsPECIALLY when they post it right after the artist posts it. And they just link to the artist’s deviantART. Pisses me off.
YES, dammit, that pisses me off so fucking much too.
lilliphus replied to your post: Users posting art only linking to a source and not…
Ugh I saw that earlier…what a dick. People do that with moni158’s stuff all the time too and I just feel awful. At least you watermark your stuff though.
This! And just like lieus-choice-stache said they’re constantly linking to her DA right after she posts something on tumblr. Every time I see that happen I want to go to their ask and tell them to go fuck themselves. AAaaaugh. FUCK THEM. lol Sorry people, this subjects really gets to me.
gay-sex-at-221b replied to your post: Users posting art only linking to a source and not…
sometimes original artist doesnt have a tumblr o:
Obviously. So what, one doesn’t link to the original website if it’s not a tumblr? That’s art theft. The problem I was talking about earlier is when the artist does have a tumblr and assholes post the picture without reblogging :|
Users posting art only linking to a source and not reblogging the original post. Of course they’re not taking credit for anything, but come on. Obviously people who don’t even bother to look for the original artist and post the image anyway are worse. That’s why everyone should write their url legibly in their pictures.
Leave it to a pair of twenty-something year-old women to do a collab about two middle-aged men licking chocolate off each other in the most sexual way possible. Typical.
You misspelled two amazingly creative and enterprising young women with the dirtiest imagination